Peer Effects on Safety and Productivity in a Simulated Workplace Through Usability and Ecological Validity Testing of a Nonimmersive Virtual Simulation With University Students: Cross-Sectional Qualitative Study.
L’essentiel
Peer effects influence workplace safety and productivity as employees observe and compare themselves to coworkers. However, prior simulation research has focused mainly on productivity in immersive settings, with limited attention to safety and little evidence on whether nonimmersive environments can capture peer effects across both domains. This study developed a nonimmersive virtual simulation to model peer effects on safety and productivity behavior. This study aimed to assess the usability and ecological validity of a theoretically grounded nonimmersive virtual simulation designed to model peer effects through exposure to virtual coworker performance information. A cross-sectional qualitative design was used across 2 iterative testing phases, alpha and beta. Participants were university students aged 18-30 years (alpha: n=12; beta: n=12). Alpha phase participants had prior kitchen experience to support early usability testing, while beta phase participants reflected the broader target population. The simulation involved timed meal preparation tasks with integrated safety requirements and peer performance feedback. Gameplay observations and semistructured interviews examined instructional clarity, environmental realism, virtual peer credibility, and scoring design. Alpha phase participants struggled with written instructions, perceived limited realism, and found peer comparisons ineffective because peer scores were unrealistic. After revisions, including experiential training, calibrated peer scores, clearer peer source messaging, and improved environmental cues, beta phase participants reported clearer instructions, greater realism, and more motivating peer comparisons. Results support that a theoretically grounded nonimmersive simulation refined through evidence-based feedback can elicit meaningful peer-related responses in safety and productivity contexts. By preserving calibrated social comparison, credible peer representation, and realistic task contingencies, the simulation offers a controlled and scalable way to examine how peer information shapes safety productivity dynamics. These findings expand methodological options for studying peer effects in settings where real-world experimentation may be impractical or unsafe.
Synthèse détaillée
Résumé original
Peer effects influence workplace safety and productivity as employees observe and compare themselves to coworkers. However, prior simulation research has focused mainly on productivity in immersive settings, with limited attention to safety and little evidence on whether nonimmersive environments can capture peer effects across both domains. This study developed a nonimmersive virtual simulation to model peer effects on safety and productivity behavior. This study aimed to assess the usability and ecological validity of a theoretically grounded nonimmersive virtual simulation designed to model peer effects through exposure to virtual coworker performance information. A cross-sectional qualitative design was used across 2 iterative testing phases, alpha and beta. Participants were university students aged 18-30 years (alpha: n=12; beta: n=12). Alpha phase participants had prior kitchen experience to support early usability testing, while beta phase participants reflected the broader target population. The simulation involved timed meal preparation tasks with integrated safety requirements and peer performance feedback. Gameplay observations and semistructured interviews examined instructional clarity, environmental realism, virtual peer credibility, and scoring design. Alpha phase participants struggled with written instructions, perceived limited realism, and found peer comparisons ineffective because peer scores were unrealistic. After revisions, including experiential training, calibrated peer scores, clearer peer source messaging, and improved environmental cues, beta phase participants reported clearer instructions, greater realism, and more motivating peer comparisons. Results support that a theoretically grounded nonimmersive simulation refined through evidence-based feedback can elicit meaningful peer-related responses in safety and productivity contexts. By preserving calibrated social comparison, credible peer representation, and realistic task contingencies, the simulation offers a controlled and scalable way to examine how peer information shapes safety productivity dynamics. These findings expand methodological options for studying peer effects in settings where real-world experimentation may be impractical or unsafe.